When I decided to post these essays it certainly wasn't because there was anything to conceal on my part. On the contrary, the motivation was supplied by crooked cops who had stolen property and falsified reports to the extent that I had been rendered destitute, and that my efforts at seeking judicial review had been thwarted. The fact that law enforcement conspicuously refused to acknowledge the theft of my personal belongings by Kevin M. Cimarusti and John A. Whitcraft, Jr. meant there were literally no other options available. So instead of crying in my cornflakes, I decided to direct my efforts to researching and writing on the subject, and so Professor Peabody and I began our journey along the Path of Enlightenment, backward and forwards looking for answers.
Not long after my last attempt to report the thefts to the Big Law Dog, I recovered the court records from the perjury charges made against Michael E. Bartley, referred by the State of California to Paul "Pffft" in October of 1998. As mentioned previously, there was no mention of an AKA or the DA Number Scam in any of those records for obvious reasons, but there was a thumbprint, presumably that of Michael E. Bartley, the uneducated, ex-Navy drug-addict. That thumbprint belongs to the individual that acquired the fraudulent ID on September 20, 1996. So if "Book-em Dan-O" Lasher says he arrested someone other than the person who acquired that ID (he actually confirms that he did arrest that person in the report), or if he says that the thumbprint doesn't correspond to the one that was used to acquire it, then he is demonstrably full of shit according to all the other parties involved, including the two judges who presided over the identity hearing and the perjury proceedings.
It took some figuring to realize that a scam was in progress, that it was preconceived and required some collaboration, but the DA Number Scam was the clincher and I didn't find out about that until December 2009 when I ordered certified copies of the records. Nor was I aware that Paul "Pffft" had sent Bartley's fines to a collection agency after he stipulated to the court that he was deceased. I did, however, note that the reference numbers corresponded with those that were adjudicated at the identity hearing on June 4, 1997 which confirmed the scam was premeditated and malicious.
So realizing this, along with the fact that Steve Cooley had once again refused to acknowledge the stolen property that made it possible, it became obvious that the same parties that had dispossessed my mother were also complicit in the thefts that had resulted in the ID fraud which had occurred ten years earlier. More importantly, however, it suggested a crime in progress and led me to question whether the California DMV had issued any other IDs after June 4, 1997 in violation of court orders, and if so, what were the residual effects assuming that the perpetrators had the same motives? That question remains unanswered.
But had it not been for the Raid, Rummage and Ransack mission by Deputy Johnston on May 4, 2007, the conspicuous removal of the California DL from 2000-04, and the contrived effort by Arcadia Police and Steve Cooley to acquire another photo based on specious charges (an Arcadia Police Department order to provide an "arrest" photo for a bogus citation sixteen days later), the rest of the elements would not have become so obvious. (For instance, Lasher's contention that the AKA referred to both the victim and the perpetrator).
And since May 2007 when I reported the thefts, CLEO aggression became so conspicuously contrived it caused me to start writing on the subject, the first pages written in August 2007, originally intended as my own narrative to the judiciary. The writing style has changed because by October 2009 the audience was no longer the judiciary, but not the subject or the message. My standards of journalistic integrity have been maintained, knowing that the people I've accused of misconduct have law enforcement authority which they have reminded me on many occasions they can wield in a number of different ways to my detriment. But there came a point when, not only had I seen enough blatant misconduct and criminality on the part of those involved, but I also became fed up with paying the price for that misconduct and criminality. In other words, I'm not the guy who has anything to hide here. They are.
CLEOs were always compelled to take the initiative as far as getting rid of evidence and witnesses. The DMV photos contemporaneous with the identity hearing, employment records, postmarked correspondence, and other documentation was clearly targeted. Police activity after my effort to seek judicial review in 2007 was commensurate with that effort. The evidence and exhibits that were keys to the effort were known to CLEOs as well as the perpetrators, Kevin M. Cimarusti and John A. Whitcraft, Jr. And those things began disappearing quickly while law enforcement not only refused to acknowledge the thefts, but became participants on many occasions, some described in previous essays. I also knew that PMAPS would never protect my interests or my property, so CLEOs and military slime had essentially been issued a license to steal, or to commit any other criminal offense, knowing they would never be subject to any penalties or prosecution.
Consider for a moment, you're approached by a guy with a gun who restrains you and steals the contents of your wallet, then drives off without any explanation. I'm not sure what law enforcement calls it, especially when the nature of the complaint is never described, nor are any charges made, but personally I refer to this sort of thing as armed robbery. What do you call it when all of your personal belongings are stolen and the cops call the guy who stole those things and tells him the thefts were discovered? I call it complicity, which makes those cops accessories. And when that stolen property starts turning up in the possession of hostile parties, used to contribute to false allegations of criminality, or planted as evidence far away from where it was stolen, you have even more criminal offenses that are directly related to the original felonious conduct by the perpetrators, which become aggravated felonies, and so on.
And perhaps more importantly, because the efforts to cover all of this up have become more egregious than the original crimes, we see the same dynamic in play by CLEOs and PMAPS. They have made it clear that they intend to use their authority as a vehicle to silence your humble writer. The stooge activity, the contrivances, the bogus complaints, the falsified reports are a daily occurrence, probably beyond the comprehension of someone who hasn't been targeted in such a manner. But the complaints that turn into falsified reports, the construction of Mt. CLEO which is clearly part of a preconceived strategy, have two elements missing. The Who and the Why are never revealed or apparent when they occur, in fact concealed to the extent that it becomes obvious they were staged, much like a typical Raid, Rummage and Ransack operation where the identity of the complainant and the nature of the complaint are left out of the equation.
The complaints made since 2007, and the police reports that result from them, are clearly coordinated and purposeful. For instance, it hasn't been particularly surprising to note that I now see CLEO stooges waiting for hours to follow me into restrooms, or that I am approached by people who are clearly part of the CLEO agenda, trying to make conversation for no other reason than to establish proximity. Or that the proliferation of CLEO stooges has increased as well as police activity to record their propensity for stalking, posing and providing photo-ops suggestive of illegal activity.
But for my part, the missing elements to the complaints, the predicates for any phony, falsified, or contrived police report, the "Officer observed" variety, the "Super-Covert" surveillance types, or the "Staged Photo-Op and Recital" endeavors, the Who and the Why are always missing. The Why is actually self-evident. CLEOs plan, choreograph and direct these things for obvious reasons; to portray illegal activity and CLEO stooges are critical to that effort. Without them, CLEOs have no basis for any complaint or allegations. But the Who is the element that allows me to connect motives and affiliations, and as any investigator will tell you, these are the most important of all the other questions.
When the cops arrive at a crime scene, for instance, they may see a home that was burglarized (keeping with the Bartley analogy). They know What happened. They probably know How it happened and probably have a good idea When it happened. Obviously they know Where. So as I've endeavored to "Investigate the Investigators" I'm looking for the same information as they are when they arrive at a crime scene. Who did it and Why, because the Why often tells us the Who and the Who will often tell us the Why, (depending on the nature of the offense). Bogus complaints then, and the phony reports that result from them, are the foundation of all things CLEO.
When the PMAPS construct a scenario of illegal activity, these reports are the building blocks, and I understand that implicitly after watching CLEO antics for so many years. I also know the complaints are planned, staged, conceived and executed by the same people for the same reasons. The motives and the affiliations are the same. The Who and the Why are constants. So my research, my investigation is different, but in many ways the same as CLEOs. The difference is that I don't have an agenda. Since I started down the Path of Enlightenment I have only connected the dots as they became apparent. I have only pointed out that of the complaints, allegations and reports that became known to me, all of them appear to share common motives and affiliations, conspicuously concealed at every juncture. And as I pointed out in the previous essay, for those of us with a background in journalism, this is the Red Meat that provides sustenance for further investigation, like the municipalities in California who refused to comply with orders to provide financial information described in the "Crunch Time" essay. ("Hey everybody, we've got something to hide and we're willing to violate state law to do it!")
The motives and affiliations are constants throughout. The Who and Why are the same regardless of whether it was a theft, a bogus complaint, a falsified report, or a phony database entry. This was how I discovered the Path of Enlightenment in the first place. And in so doing, it became obvious that CLEO motives have, and never will change. In fact, they are more compelled than ever to construct a plausible scenario of illegal activity because suing for libel is not an option. Which takes us back to my original statement from the first chapter written in August 2007. The more crimes these people commit the more Accusing Fingers are aimed at me. The Accusing Fingers of course, have become hordes since the tactical thefts described in the first chapters, but still with the same motives and affiliations.
© humble journalist
The attack on the account while I wrote this essay was almost unprecedented. Several paragraphs of text were deleted as I wrote, so I did my best to reconstruct them. But the modus operandi has clearly remained the same over the years, the access to my accounts just as illegal as when I started.
Link to next post http://burgersonly.blogspot.com
Monday, August 29, 2011
Saturday, August 27, 2011
Journalism 201: CLEO Bullshit Removal
When I wrote the first piece, the effort here was described as "investigating the investigators" because I had seen enough CLEO bullshit to last several lifetimes by then (17 months ago). So I started to describe some of them in Essay 3: http://humblejournalist.hubpages.com/hub/cleos Since then, CLEO tactics haven't changed much, the common denominator being the infinite varieties of false attribution that CLEOs have incorporated to support various storylines. Cops are trained, and supported by PMAPS, to falsify reports because their jobs are predicated on the assumption that they will accuse and arrest people who do something illegal. So that is what they do. That is not what journalists do. So let's look at how the investigative processes are completely different and often directly opposed using examples.
Now when I heard Casey Gwinn's admission that perjury had been committed in thousands of cases he had prosecuted, as a student of logic I was astounded because anyone who understands logic also knows that a false premise guarantees a false conclusion. Therefore, if perjury was part of the process, a false premise, then the conclusion, the verdict, would necessarily be false as well. This is the justice system? I guess so, but it should also be noted that when the "victims" that Gwinn used as vehicles to prosecute those cases didn't wish to testify or recanted their complaints, he went ahead with the prosecutions anyway using police reports from the initial arrest. In other words, the court became a clearinghouse for false reports, because without a victim, there was little, if anything, left to support the charges.
Since then, every example of official I've seen authored by law enforcement was falsified to some extent, including what appear to be deliberate alterations, based on specious complaints. All of the complaints, reports and other manifestations of law enforcement authority have also been tactical in nature. On May 4, 2007 when Deputy Johnston stole the California DL that was current and valid between 2000-04, he did so based on a bogus complaint by some clowns that appeared to be military slime. When I asked about the basis for the complaint, the identity of the complainants, he continued to rummage through my wallet until he found the ID, removed it and told me it was "illegal" to possess it. Of course, this was CLEO bullshit in its purest form because he knew the significance of the ID, that the photo had been used elsewhere by law enforcement in a bogus arrest and booking report or perhaps records that falsely attributed criminal activity to your humble writer.
So along the way I've constantly been at odds with the "investigative procedures" of law enforcement, because when these Raid, Rummage, Ransack incidents occur, not only are they based on specious allegations, they conspicuously subtract valid information. In this case, and the repeat performance executed by Deputy Goon and Deputy Alcala on May 3, 2011, the Who, the What and the Why are subtracted from the investigative process and as a journalist investigating the investigators that information is critical and part of the process. I can make reasonable assumptions about the answers to those questions based on my knowledge of the motives and affiliations of those who have been compelled to steal, corrupt, destroy or transport my personal belongings because the patterns have been consistent, but I have seen nothing to indicate that law enforcement "investigative procedures" have anything to do with accurate reporting.
And why should they? CLEOs and PMAPS have objectives that are often defeated by accurate reporting. Take for instance "Book-em Dan-O" Lasher's narrative. Here's a guy calling himself and law enforcement professional, an "investigator" of criminal activity. And here we have an alleged perpetrator who says he burglarized a house, removing a picture ID. (For the moment we'll forget about how that doesn't translate into another ID). Now at this point anyone familiar with journalistic processes would ask "Where did the burglary take place? When did it occur? How did you enter the residence? Why did you break into the residence in the first place? To acquire the ID that you somehow knew was sitting on the coffee table, or for another reason? What else did you take while you were there?" and so on.
But in every law enforcement report I've seen, critical data and information is either conspicuously omitted or in some cases altered. This is because law enforcement has different objectives, an agenda, that is intended to result in charges of illegal activity or to support previous falsified reports. So when I see the cops recovering stuff from Boomerangs a few moments after they cross my path, or CLEO stalkers following me around while the cops follow them around taking pictures, or when a typical CLEO enters bogus information into a report like, "Victim says he was standing in front of a restroom" when the reason for doing so is almost comically transparent, it is clear that journalistic standards and law enforcement standards have very little in common because CLEOs have an agenda that never changes. Journalists do not.
Does it matter that I never said that? No. Does it matter that I made the correction on the report and returned it? No. Does it matter that the video would disprove it? No. Because it is a police report, authored by the police that serves the interests of the police. Based on what I've seen from law enforcement officials, their reports are basically fictional accounts of illegal activity supported by the stooges that they direct for the purpose of supporting phony reports, which is antithetical to journalistic standards. They lie whenever it serves their purposes just like anyone else who thinks the consequences of telling the truth are outweighed by the benefits of lying. And at this point, after years of fielding bogus complaints and falsifying reports, they have a lot to lie about.
This shouldn't be particularly surprising though, because the objectives of CLEOs and PMAPS are certain and do not yield to reason, logic, reality or the truth. In fact, they are often in direct opposition, so law enforcement reports have all been tactical in nature. "Officer observed (blah, blah, blah)" is the device, the bogus complaints and false pretenses the vehicle for these reports. What I am suggesting is that the construction of Mt. CLEO, the steady, unrelenting addition of dirt clods over years using these reports, has been strategic; that all of the complaints and reports have been not only consistent in their purpose, but also predicated on the complaints by those with common motives and affiliations.
These elements, the Who and Why, have always been conspicuously subtracted despite my efforts to include them in my investigation of the investigators. And even when the What was available, the video to support the allegation for example, it was conspicuously omitted. Therefore, I have concluded that law enforcement reports essentially prove a collaborative, malicious effort. Why? Because without those particulars accuracy is impossible and law enforcement effectively precludes adjudication, the civil procedures that provide for response to false complaints, slander, or any possibility of contesting the allegations. This is not how accuracy is attained. It also proves that for law enforcement to accomplish its objectives, relevant information, indeed critical information, must be subtracted from the equation. Of course, this explains why so much police activity throughout this story has been instigated or supported by CLEO stooges and proxies, especially military slime. All of it, in fact, as near as I can tell.
This is not how journalists do their job. But it is also obvious that law enforcement officials have different objectives, and therefore, different ways of looking at reports or anything resembling accuracy. So we will continue with the knowledge that law enforcement reports are nothing more than renditions of CLEO bullshit, self-serving and contrived, but separating the bullshit from the burgers isn't that difficult when you take a closer look at why critical information has been subtracted by CLEOs, and conversely, this is exactly where journalists find relevant information.
How many times has this concept been proven by corrupt public officials? If you look at the "Crunch Time" essay posted at humbleauthor.blogspot.com you'll see that 172 municipalities in California refused to comply with state law regarding their finances. The information they are conspicuously concealing is red meat to those of see journalism as a professional endeavor (as opposed to an occupation that allows for the elimination adversaries and critics using the authority associated with it). And if you look at all the evidence of what I've described in these essays, those things that remains in my possession despite repeated law enforcement attacks and confiscations, you'll find that reports by law enforcement officials are hardly the place to look for an accurate account of anything. But they are a good place to look for motives, affiliations, strategy and agenda of those involved.
© humble journalist
Now when I heard Casey Gwinn's admission that perjury had been committed in thousands of cases he had prosecuted, as a student of logic I was astounded because anyone who understands logic also knows that a false premise guarantees a false conclusion. Therefore, if perjury was part of the process, a false premise, then the conclusion, the verdict, would necessarily be false as well. This is the justice system? I guess so, but it should also be noted that when the "victims" that Gwinn used as vehicles to prosecute those cases didn't wish to testify or recanted their complaints, he went ahead with the prosecutions anyway using police reports from the initial arrest. In other words, the court became a clearinghouse for false reports, because without a victim, there was little, if anything, left to support the charges.
Since then, every example of official I've seen authored by law enforcement was falsified to some extent, including what appear to be deliberate alterations, based on specious complaints. All of the complaints, reports and other manifestations of law enforcement authority have also been tactical in nature. On May 4, 2007 when Deputy Johnston stole the California DL that was current and valid between 2000-04, he did so based on a bogus complaint by some clowns that appeared to be military slime. When I asked about the basis for the complaint, the identity of the complainants, he continued to rummage through my wallet until he found the ID, removed it and told me it was "illegal" to possess it. Of course, this was CLEO bullshit in its purest form because he knew the significance of the ID, that the photo had been used elsewhere by law enforcement in a bogus arrest and booking report or perhaps records that falsely attributed criminal activity to your humble writer.
So along the way I've constantly been at odds with the "investigative procedures" of law enforcement, because when these Raid, Rummage, Ransack incidents occur, not only are they based on specious allegations, they conspicuously subtract valid information. In this case, and the repeat performance executed by Deputy Goon and Deputy Alcala on May 3, 2011, the Who, the What and the Why are subtracted from the investigative process and as a journalist investigating the investigators that information is critical and part of the process. I can make reasonable assumptions about the answers to those questions based on my knowledge of the motives and affiliations of those who have been compelled to steal, corrupt, destroy or transport my personal belongings because the patterns have been consistent, but I have seen nothing to indicate that law enforcement "investigative procedures" have anything to do with accurate reporting.
And why should they? CLEOs and PMAPS have objectives that are often defeated by accurate reporting. Take for instance "Book-em Dan-O" Lasher's narrative. Here's a guy calling himself and law enforcement professional, an "investigator" of criminal activity. And here we have an alleged perpetrator who says he burglarized a house, removing a picture ID. (For the moment we'll forget about how that doesn't translate into another ID). Now at this point anyone familiar with journalistic processes would ask "Where did the burglary take place? When did it occur? How did you enter the residence? Why did you break into the residence in the first place? To acquire the ID that you somehow knew was sitting on the coffee table, or for another reason? What else did you take while you were there?" and so on.
But in every law enforcement report I've seen, critical data and information is either conspicuously omitted or in some cases altered. This is because law enforcement has different objectives, an agenda, that is intended to result in charges of illegal activity or to support previous falsified reports. So when I see the cops recovering stuff from Boomerangs a few moments after they cross my path, or CLEO stalkers following me around while the cops follow them around taking pictures, or when a typical CLEO enters bogus information into a report like, "Victim says he was standing in front of a restroom" when the reason for doing so is almost comically transparent, it is clear that journalistic standards and law enforcement standards have very little in common because CLEOs have an agenda that never changes. Journalists do not.
Does it matter that I never said that? No. Does it matter that I made the correction on the report and returned it? No. Does it matter that the video would disprove it? No. Because it is a police report, authored by the police that serves the interests of the police. Based on what I've seen from law enforcement officials, their reports are basically fictional accounts of illegal activity supported by the stooges that they direct for the purpose of supporting phony reports, which is antithetical to journalistic standards. They lie whenever it serves their purposes just like anyone else who thinks the consequences of telling the truth are outweighed by the benefits of lying. And at this point, after years of fielding bogus complaints and falsifying reports, they have a lot to lie about.
This shouldn't be particularly surprising though, because the objectives of CLEOs and PMAPS are certain and do not yield to reason, logic, reality or the truth. In fact, they are often in direct opposition, so law enforcement reports have all been tactical in nature. "Officer observed (blah, blah, blah)" is the device, the bogus complaints and false pretenses the vehicle for these reports. What I am suggesting is that the construction of Mt. CLEO, the steady, unrelenting addition of dirt clods over years using these reports, has been strategic; that all of the complaints and reports have been not only consistent in their purpose, but also predicated on the complaints by those with common motives and affiliations.
These elements, the Who and Why, have always been conspicuously subtracted despite my efforts to include them in my investigation of the investigators. And even when the What was available, the video to support the allegation for example, it was conspicuously omitted. Therefore, I have concluded that law enforcement reports essentially prove a collaborative, malicious effort. Why? Because without those particulars accuracy is impossible and law enforcement effectively precludes adjudication, the civil procedures that provide for response to false complaints, slander, or any possibility of contesting the allegations. This is not how accuracy is attained. It also proves that for law enforcement to accomplish its objectives, relevant information, indeed critical information, must be subtracted from the equation. Of course, this explains why so much police activity throughout this story has been instigated or supported by CLEO stooges and proxies, especially military slime. All of it, in fact, as near as I can tell.
This is not how journalists do their job. But it is also obvious that law enforcement officials have different objectives, and therefore, different ways of looking at reports or anything resembling accuracy. So we will continue with the knowledge that law enforcement reports are nothing more than renditions of CLEO bullshit, self-serving and contrived, but separating the bullshit from the burgers isn't that difficult when you take a closer look at why critical information has been subtracted by CLEOs, and conversely, this is exactly where journalists find relevant information.
How many times has this concept been proven by corrupt public officials? If you look at the "Crunch Time" essay posted at humbleauthor.blogspot.com you'll see that 172 municipalities in California refused to comply with state law regarding their finances. The information they are conspicuously concealing is red meat to those of see journalism as a professional endeavor (as opposed to an occupation that allows for the elimination adversaries and critics using the authority associated with it). And if you look at all the evidence of what I've described in these essays, those things that remains in my possession despite repeated law enforcement attacks and confiscations, you'll find that reports by law enforcement officials are hardly the place to look for an accurate account of anything. But they are a good place to look for motives, affiliations, strategy and agenda of those involved.
© humble journalist
Friday, August 26, 2011
GOP Tightens Grip On Humble Writer
Along the imprecise path of enlightenment, I have noted that 90% of the population somehow managed to remain uninvolved in the series of events that led to this point. For some reason, Republican law enforcement officials and military slime have always imposed themselves on my humble path, stood in the way, blocked it, or committed some sort of criminal offense against myself or my mom, so the story is really about them. It wouldn't have turned into a 1200-page book had it not been for these people making me part of their agenda, which I didn't realize until the motives and affiliations became so utterly obvious.
So I've become destitute, but careful not to break any laws knowing that these people do not appreciate me pointing out that they are crooks. Two days prior to this entry, I had the honor of meeting the presiding judge in Boulder City, Nv., the Honorable Victor L. Miller. Unfortunately, His Honor didn't appear thrilled to see me, but no one else affiliated with the Republican Party is either. Especially in towns where Republicanism and Militarism are pretty much the same thing. Here's a brief bio on His Honor:
"Honorable Victor L Miller in Boulder City, NV is a private company categorized under County Government Offices. Employment history: (Judge Miller) Clark County Credit Union."
"The Boulder City Municipal Court is presided over by Judge Victor L. Miller.Judge Miller was appointed Municipal Judge in February of 1984.He was born in Toole, Utah and has been a Nevada resident since 1954.He graduated from Brigham Young University in 1977 with a Bachelor of Arts degree. He earned his Juris Doctor degree from McGeorge School of Law, University of the Pacific in 1981."
A private company?
Now I realize that Chris Owens didn't like being named a candidate for the "Big Brown Burrito" Cleo Award, but I made that nomination based on restroom ambushes that were becoming so blatant that something had to be said, if only for the sake of the poor kids that were being dragged into restrooms by their Dirtbag Dads, obviously directed by the cops. Of course, this was one of the CLEO storylines constructed with the help of CLEO stooges, something I've been reluctantly observing and writing about since May 2007 when I made the theft report to law enforcement officials with jurisdiction. This sort of thing proves that CLEOs are clever and coordinated in their efforts, and that CLEO storylines never die, but they do require maintenance by CLEO stooges and police such that they contribute to the growth of Mt. CLEO over time.
So it wasn't unexpected to find that Judge Miller must be a close associate of Mr. Owens, since it appears they both graduated from BYU in 1977 and both graduated from University of the Pacific in 1981. (If not, we have a striking coincidence here). At any rate, I made my point about the alleged "family values" of the Republicans who were involved with this sordid tale, and I felt compelled to do so because at every significant juncture the hypocrisy of these people was truly astounding, especially when one considers the implications of asking children to commit perjury to support false reports by authorities. If find the practice repulsive and degrading to everyone involved, especially me. Of course, all of the falsified reports by law enforcement are degrading, but if the comical dialog of Lasher's narrative is their idea of "credible" law enforcement activities, I'll be content to maintain my journalistic standards.
These are the "Preachers and Punks" that I refer to so often. The crusading hypocrites, the Accusing Fingers who demonstrate their contempt for the laws the rest of us are expected to live by on a daily basis. The propensity for military slime to commit criminal offenses when they don't fear prosecution is understandable because many of these people would have remained in America's trailer parks, stealing hubcaps and hanging around the welfare office had it not been for the U.S. military giving them a haircut and a uniform. But those that are supposedly well-educated, refined community leaders engaging in these tactics is truly offensive on many levels. And I don't like the fact that all these morons on Republicans with an agenda that has been demonstrably hostile and criminal in many respects and on many occasions.
So once again, I am more or less obliged to connect the dots, introducing the characters that impose themselves on my journey, as we proceed on the imprecise path of enlightenment. But as long as we are once again overwhelmed with CLEO bullshit to the exclusion of other more interesting subjects, I've decided it is time to reveal the secret of the "secret code" that all of the CLEO stooges have done such a wonderful job of portraying in public places.
That's right, the way it works is based on the clues found here, just like CLEOs have always portrayed it, er, suspected it. Note that I referred to the Cracker Jack guy on more than one occasion. Inside the Cracker Jack box you'll find your secret code ring. Take the date of the post, then divide it by the month, then the year. You will arrive at a fractional number. Multiply it times the number of essays. Now put on a Mr. Blackwell outfit with a black hat, making sure that it is at least 100 degrees outside. If not, you'll have to wait longer to use the code ring, because only when you are about to pass out from heat stroke will the 3's become 8's and the 5's begin to look like 6's. This is the key to the secret code. Once you've done your calculation, but prior to passing out from heat stroke, use that number to enter into your Cracker Jack secret code ring which will reveal the secret code number. Then, making sure you are still wearing your Mr. Blackwell outfit, position yourself near a surveillance camera. If you can't find one, step outside, and wait for a police patrol car to pass by. This usually only takes a few seconds. Once you've positioned yourself for the camera or the patrol car, take out your cell phone, then enter the secret code number. Make sure to press 'Send' while maintaining position or prior to moving away from the surveillance camera, or preferably before the patrol car passes.
There you have it, ladies and geraniums. Just as the CLEOs always suspected using their inimitable law enforcement instincts, selfless Public Service diligence and incomparable brain power to decipher the code revealing the sophisticated, super-covert tactics of underworld characters like your humble writer.
© humble journalist
So I've become destitute, but careful not to break any laws knowing that these people do not appreciate me pointing out that they are crooks. Two days prior to this entry, I had the honor of meeting the presiding judge in Boulder City, Nv., the Honorable Victor L. Miller. Unfortunately, His Honor didn't appear thrilled to see me, but no one else affiliated with the Republican Party is either. Especially in towns where Republicanism and Militarism are pretty much the same thing. Here's a brief bio on His Honor:
"Honorable Victor L Miller in Boulder City, NV is a private company categorized under County Government Offices. Employment history: (Judge Miller) Clark County Credit Union."
"The Boulder City Municipal Court is presided over by Judge Victor L. Miller.Judge Miller was appointed Municipal Judge in February of 1984.He was born in Toole, Utah and has been a Nevada resident since 1954.He graduated from Brigham Young University in 1977 with a Bachelor of Arts degree. He earned his Juris Doctor degree from McGeorge School of Law, University of the Pacific in 1981."
A private company?
Now I realize that Chris Owens didn't like being named a candidate for the "Big Brown Burrito" Cleo Award, but I made that nomination based on restroom ambushes that were becoming so blatant that something had to be said, if only for the sake of the poor kids that were being dragged into restrooms by their Dirtbag Dads, obviously directed by the cops. Of course, this was one of the CLEO storylines constructed with the help of CLEO stooges, something I've been reluctantly observing and writing about since May 2007 when I made the theft report to law enforcement officials with jurisdiction. This sort of thing proves that CLEOs are clever and coordinated in their efforts, and that CLEO storylines never die, but they do require maintenance by CLEO stooges and police such that they contribute to the growth of Mt. CLEO over time.
So it wasn't unexpected to find that Judge Miller must be a close associate of Mr. Owens, since it appears they both graduated from BYU in 1977 and both graduated from University of the Pacific in 1981. (If not, we have a striking coincidence here). At any rate, I made my point about the alleged "family values" of the Republicans who were involved with this sordid tale, and I felt compelled to do so because at every significant juncture the hypocrisy of these people was truly astounding, especially when one considers the implications of asking children to commit perjury to support false reports by authorities. If find the practice repulsive and degrading to everyone involved, especially me. Of course, all of the falsified reports by law enforcement are degrading, but if the comical dialog of Lasher's narrative is their idea of "credible" law enforcement activities, I'll be content to maintain my journalistic standards.
These are the "Preachers and Punks" that I refer to so often. The crusading hypocrites, the Accusing Fingers who demonstrate their contempt for the laws the rest of us are expected to live by on a daily basis. The propensity for military slime to commit criminal offenses when they don't fear prosecution is understandable because many of these people would have remained in America's trailer parks, stealing hubcaps and hanging around the welfare office had it not been for the U.S. military giving them a haircut and a uniform. But those that are supposedly well-educated, refined community leaders engaging in these tactics is truly offensive on many levels. And I don't like the fact that all these morons on Republicans with an agenda that has been demonstrably hostile and criminal in many respects and on many occasions.
So once again, I am more or less obliged to connect the dots, introducing the characters that impose themselves on my journey, as we proceed on the imprecise path of enlightenment. But as long as we are once again overwhelmed with CLEO bullshit to the exclusion of other more interesting subjects, I've decided it is time to reveal the secret of the "secret code" that all of the CLEO stooges have done such a wonderful job of portraying in public places.
That's right, the way it works is based on the clues found here, just like CLEOs have always portrayed it, er, suspected it. Note that I referred to the Cracker Jack guy on more than one occasion. Inside the Cracker Jack box you'll find your secret code ring. Take the date of the post, then divide it by the month, then the year. You will arrive at a fractional number. Multiply it times the number of essays. Now put on a Mr. Blackwell outfit with a black hat, making sure that it is at least 100 degrees outside. If not, you'll have to wait longer to use the code ring, because only when you are about to pass out from heat stroke will the 3's become 8's and the 5's begin to look like 6's. This is the key to the secret code. Once you've done your calculation, but prior to passing out from heat stroke, use that number to enter into your Cracker Jack secret code ring which will reveal the secret code number. Then, making sure you are still wearing your Mr. Blackwell outfit, position yourself near a surveillance camera. If you can't find one, step outside, and wait for a police patrol car to pass by. This usually only takes a few seconds. Once you've positioned yourself for the camera or the patrol car, take out your cell phone, then enter the secret code number. Make sure to press 'Send' while maintaining position or prior to moving away from the surveillance camera, or preferably before the patrol car passes.
There you have it, ladies and geraniums. Just as the CLEOs always suspected using their inimitable law enforcement instincts, selfless Public Service diligence and incomparable brain power to decipher the code revealing the sophisticated, super-covert tactics of underworld characters like your humble writer.
© humble journalist
Where's Goliath?
As Mt. CLEO has grown over the years, the various CLEO storylines supported by tactical complaints and falsified reports, the solution to the "credibility" issue has always been apparent. The idea of "You Bet Your Life" Polygraph Palooza isn't far-fetched or without merit. Polygraph testing is used by law enforcement, corporations and the courts daily, because it has always had a legitimate purpose. The 96% accuracy rate is much better than most medical diagnostic procedures. So as I've watched CLEOs construct plausible scenarios of illegal activity using the various tactics described here, Polygraph Palooza has always been the solution to the "credibility" issues that have been raised. Not by me, but by the CLEOs, their stooges and the military slime that somehow always know what sort of complaints and allegations are necessary to support the construction of Mt. CLEO and that tactical ambushes are necessary to make those complaints.
The fact that CLEOs have conspicuously avoided judicial review, that they have corrupted or destroyed evidence in a targeted manner, that they have recruited dirtbags to perform tricks like harassment and provocation, photo-op posing and script-reading events, that they have always relied on falsified written reports when video was available that would disprove those reports, has not escaped my notice. It indicates a clear pattern, a modus operandi, that has been repeated by law enforcement professionals in every jurisdiction I've been in since reporting the thefts of personal belongings and the fraudulent General Power of Attorney document that Whitcraft used to dispossess my mother and to keep her from receiving proper medical attention.
I have always found it amusing that the people that have made what are sometimes bizarre allegations, some of which have to chase me around or hide in restrooms to do it, have never accused me of the only thing that pertains to these issues. After all the ridiculous claims made by the Accusing Fingers, clearly in an orchestrated manner, no one has accused me of libel, the only allegation that would actually do any damage, that would actually address the issue of whether my journalistic standards have been compromised, or that there would be a motive to lie about any of the content of the essays. The only allegation that would hurt my feelings.
The only discernible motive I have found is the motive by law enforcement to concoct storylines, to falsify reports, to construct scenarios of illegal activity, to plant evidence or to frame your humble writer for a crime he didn't commit, all of these things almost stereotypical of crooked cops. So the solution to these issues, Polygraph Palooza, sits there like the elephant in the room, larger than Mt. CLEO, conspicuously avoided by those who have made bogus complaints and allegations.
So I will repeat my challenge to any member of the CLEO community and anyone else that has made an allegation of misconduct against me. You are welcome to establish your "credibility" using scientific means, proven over decades of use by professionals who rely on that data for legitimate purposes. And knowing that there are too many CLEOs and military slime complainants to participate, knowing there are just too many people with a motive to fabricate, prevaricate and accuse, why not select a representative from the crowd of CLEOs and CLEO-friendly bullshitters? Those that have been too cowardly to make those complaints in my presence? Sort of like David and Goliath, CLEOs could send out their Big Gun to represent their interests in a showdown for all the marbles. (My choice of course would be the "Big Brown Burrito" himself, "Fairlane" Ford).
All of the "credibility" issues could be resolved in less than an hour, and if I were to lose the contest, CLEOs would never have to admit that they all of my reporting is accurate, it is theirs that has been consistently false, and that they have no cause for any claim of libelous reporting on my part. That their reliance on bogus allegations and falsified reports is only necessary (to them) because they have no other means of dealing with the accuracy of these reports. That they their allegations are not only specious, but retaliatory, collaborative and slanderous. That they are, simply put, full of shit, completely reliant on their authority to cover up their own misconduct and falsifications.
But in the real world, (and for practical reasons like knowing that they would lose), I also realize the challenge will never be accepted, so I stand before the CLEO Legion like David asking for a challenger without response, and cowering in the rear you'll find "Fairlane" Ford hiding behind his badge. The gutless wonder of the Sierra Madre Police Department, proving that cowardly, worm-like, wanna-be cops grow up to be cowardly, worm-like "Big Brown Burritos" like him; that pieces of shit like Ford spend their entire lives hiding behind uniforms, content with their parasitic existence, and completely reliant on bullshit to maintain it; and that a trained chimpanzee could probably falsify a police report.
So like David, I stand before the CLEO Legion and ask, "Where is your Goliath?"
© humble journalist
The fact that CLEOs have conspicuously avoided judicial review, that they have corrupted or destroyed evidence in a targeted manner, that they have recruited dirtbags to perform tricks like harassment and provocation, photo-op posing and script-reading events, that they have always relied on falsified written reports when video was available that would disprove those reports, has not escaped my notice. It indicates a clear pattern, a modus operandi, that has been repeated by law enforcement professionals in every jurisdiction I've been in since reporting the thefts of personal belongings and the fraudulent General Power of Attorney document that Whitcraft used to dispossess my mother and to keep her from receiving proper medical attention.
I have always found it amusing that the people that have made what are sometimes bizarre allegations, some of which have to chase me around or hide in restrooms to do it, have never accused me of the only thing that pertains to these issues. After all the ridiculous claims made by the Accusing Fingers, clearly in an orchestrated manner, no one has accused me of libel, the only allegation that would actually do any damage, that would actually address the issue of whether my journalistic standards have been compromised, or that there would be a motive to lie about any of the content of the essays. The only allegation that would hurt my feelings.
The only discernible motive I have found is the motive by law enforcement to concoct storylines, to falsify reports, to construct scenarios of illegal activity, to plant evidence or to frame your humble writer for a crime he didn't commit, all of these things almost stereotypical of crooked cops. So the solution to these issues, Polygraph Palooza, sits there like the elephant in the room, larger than Mt. CLEO, conspicuously avoided by those who have made bogus complaints and allegations.
So I will repeat my challenge to any member of the CLEO community and anyone else that has made an allegation of misconduct against me. You are welcome to establish your "credibility" using scientific means, proven over decades of use by professionals who rely on that data for legitimate purposes. And knowing that there are too many CLEOs and military slime complainants to participate, knowing there are just too many people with a motive to fabricate, prevaricate and accuse, why not select a representative from the crowd of CLEOs and CLEO-friendly bullshitters? Those that have been too cowardly to make those complaints in my presence? Sort of like David and Goliath, CLEOs could send out their Big Gun to represent their interests in a showdown for all the marbles. (My choice of course would be the "Big Brown Burrito" himself, "Fairlane" Ford).
All of the "credibility" issues could be resolved in less than an hour, and if I were to lose the contest, CLEOs would never have to admit that they all of my reporting is accurate, it is theirs that has been consistently false, and that they have no cause for any claim of libelous reporting on my part. That their reliance on bogus allegations and falsified reports is only necessary (to them) because they have no other means of dealing with the accuracy of these reports. That they their allegations are not only specious, but retaliatory, collaborative and slanderous. That they are, simply put, full of shit, completely reliant on their authority to cover up their own misconduct and falsifications.
But in the real world, (and for practical reasons like knowing that they would lose), I also realize the challenge will never be accepted, so I stand before the CLEO Legion like David asking for a challenger without response, and cowering in the rear you'll find "Fairlane" Ford hiding behind his badge. The gutless wonder of the Sierra Madre Police Department, proving that cowardly, worm-like, wanna-be cops grow up to be cowardly, worm-like "Big Brown Burritos" like him; that pieces of shit like Ford spend their entire lives hiding behind uniforms, content with their parasitic existence, and completely reliant on bullshit to maintain it; and that a trained chimpanzee could probably falsify a police report.
So like David, I stand before the CLEO Legion and ask, "Where is your Goliath?"
© humble journalist
Thursday, August 25, 2011
"Equal Protection" For CLEOs And PMAPS
Along this imprecise path to the points that I believe have some contemporary significance, it should be emphasized that almost every step along the way has resulted in bogus complaints by those with motives and affiliations that are constant. It should be noted that falsified reports by law enforcement have also been a matter of course. Lasher's comical effort at creative dialog was the first example, quickly followed by a baseless accusation of a threat (Margaret Remsburg representing the State of California), which was baseless and nonsensical in context. Falsified reports by law enforcement continued from that point, and only increased after I found that virtually all of my belongings had been stolen. CLEO aggression has only increased with my efforts to seek judicial review and publication of my descriptive accounts.
As if to emphasize the point further, and to point out that jurisdiction has nothing to do with CLEO antics, "Assholette" Davis provided another example recently in Mr. Roger's neighborhood with a report that included the contention that I told her that I was "standing in front" of a restroom, (apparently her effort to provide a kidney for the "Book-em Dan-O" Lasher organ donation program). At every point in between, in every jurisdiction, CLEO tactics have been uniformly reliant on falsified police reports. But the point I'm trying to make here is not just that cops lie whenever it serves their purposes, or that falsified reports have been the response to the "credibility" test that Whitcraft's parrot seemed to think was useful. (Ask a cop whether anything Whitcraft says is accurate? So Whitcraft doesn't have as much "credibility" as the cops? Not as much as "Big Brown Burrito" Award-winner "Fairlane" Ford? He's right. Not even the cops are as full of shit as Whitcraft, the exception being ankle-grabber Ford. Thanks for making the point for me.)
The point is that law enforcement has proved on many occasions, since Lasher's arrest and booking report, since Paul "Pffft" made sure not to mention an AKA or reference to a DA number that referred to two different people in court, that timely judicial review was, and continues to be, antithetical to every aspect of the various CLEO scams. In other words, if at any point that judicial review was the logical outcome, charges associated with the phony narrative, the subsequent bogus complaints by military slime, the alleged burglary that was actually committed by Kevin Cimarusti, it would also become known that allegations were based on transcribed recitals, that video existed that disproved those reports, that "Igor" Cimarusti stole the items Bartley used to gain IDs prior to his death, or that DMV photos were being switched. So the proverbial elephant in the room remains the conspicuous absence of charges associated with any of the complaints or police reports.
It is a matter of record that everywhere I go bogus complaints are made by those with the common motives and affiliations I've described. If they weren't bullshit, I wouldn't be mentioning them here. And when I am aware of them as I was when Ms. Hairston came unglued because my mother smiled and tried to wave in recognition, the cops make sure not to respond until after I leave the area, even if I wait for hours. In this way, the Accusing Fingers always maintain the upper hand, and by making sure that judicial review never takes place, the video or other evidence that disproves the complaint or allegations is destroyed, and in this way law enforcement (and CLEO stooges) have managed to cover their tracks at every significant juncture.
"Book-em Dan-O" Lasher and Paul "Pffft" couldn't bring charges associated with any of those arrests for several very good reasons, the most obvious being that I was never arrested and could have easily proved it, and I still had the photo IDs I suspect were used in those reports the day of the identity hearing June 4, 1997. The same principle continues to be pervasive as far as CLEO tactics, and it explains why the Accusing Fingers are very careful to make sure that I am not aware of the complaint when it is actually made. Why Ms. Honey for instance became almost hysterical when I glanced at her notepad to see what she was writing while the cops were setting up for the staged arrest outside. She was preparing a bogus complaint that was supposed to be handed to the cops after I left, so my glance caused more hysteria of the type displayed by Ms. Hairston and several County Hags before and since.
Of course, now that those involved have had plenty of time to destroy the evidence of what actually occurred, when they can say that the video or the records are no longer available, they are much more likely to make their bogus allegations that are supported only by their own statements. CLEOs have never deviated from this pattern, conspicuously avoiding any possibility of contesting the allegations in a timely manner. The last time I actually appeared in court, Steve Cooley dropped the specious charge because he had acquired the arrest and booking photo which was the objective of that particular CLEO charade. (I wasn't even arrested when the citation was issued. But the entire fiasco reminded me that CLEOs have always tried to portray me as an idiot while I've been dissembling their scams thinking the same thing about them.)
No, CLEOs only make their bogus contentions long after any opportunity to properly contest the allegations has passed, the advantage going to CLEOs and PMAPS who can wait for years before filing charges, knowing that the evidence disproving the allegations has been destroyed. So when I read about the guy who had spent eighteen years in prison because a Piece O' Shit prosecutor had ditched the evidence that exonerated him, I wasn't particularly surprised because I've been watching the same principle being demonstrated by CLEOs over the last two decades. It is CLEOs and PMAPS that are primarily responsible for theft, corruption and destruction of evidence for obvious reasons. Not only my personal belongings, the photo IDs associated with all of this, the documentation and records that prove what really occurred, but removing my mother from the list of potential witnesses, falsifying reports to support phony reports in the past, and recruiting CLEO stooges to supply them with bogus complaints and statements intended to cover it up.
So after almost two decades of watching CLEO antics, reporting the separate but related criminal offenses perpetrated against me or my mother at each point they became known, after seeking judicial review on several occasions and writing what has become a 1200-page book with excerpts posted here, no judicial review of any aspect of this has ever taken place. No opportunity to contest any allegation or complaint made against me has ever been possible because CLEOs know that bogus complaints and falsified reports are based solely on the alleged "credibilty" of those that made the complaint or authored the report, and therefore destruction of the evidence that disproves those allegations has always been a requisite.
It could have also been mentioned in the previous essay that the Internet-based attacks on accounts, hardware, software and storage media are felonious activities as well. I'm not a JD like some our esteemed characters, but it has occurred to me that the impersonation involved with any bogus accounts associated with me, especially if stolen property was involved, it could constitute yet another example of a criminal offense perpetrated against your humble writer along with the other CLEO antics described here. That's why the path to the significant points I'm trying to make is necessarily imprecise. In many instances, and on a regular basis, CLEOs, provide the examples for those arguments.
© humble journalist
As if to emphasize the point further, and to point out that jurisdiction has nothing to do with CLEO antics, "Assholette" Davis provided another example recently in Mr. Roger's neighborhood with a report that included the contention that I told her that I was "standing in front" of a restroom, (apparently her effort to provide a kidney for the "Book-em Dan-O" Lasher organ donation program). At every point in between, in every jurisdiction, CLEO tactics have been uniformly reliant on falsified police reports. But the point I'm trying to make here is not just that cops lie whenever it serves their purposes, or that falsified reports have been the response to the "credibility" test that Whitcraft's parrot seemed to think was useful. (Ask a cop whether anything Whitcraft says is accurate? So Whitcraft doesn't have as much "credibility" as the cops? Not as much as "Big Brown Burrito" Award-winner "Fairlane" Ford? He's right. Not even the cops are as full of shit as Whitcraft, the exception being ankle-grabber Ford. Thanks for making the point for me.)
The point is that law enforcement has proved on many occasions, since Lasher's arrest and booking report, since Paul "Pffft" made sure not to mention an AKA or reference to a DA number that referred to two different people in court, that timely judicial review was, and continues to be, antithetical to every aspect of the various CLEO scams. In other words, if at any point that judicial review was the logical outcome, charges associated with the phony narrative, the subsequent bogus complaints by military slime, the alleged burglary that was actually committed by Kevin Cimarusti, it would also become known that allegations were based on transcribed recitals, that video existed that disproved those reports, that "Igor" Cimarusti stole the items Bartley used to gain IDs prior to his death, or that DMV photos were being switched. So the proverbial elephant in the room remains the conspicuous absence of charges associated with any of the complaints or police reports.
It is a matter of record that everywhere I go bogus complaints are made by those with the common motives and affiliations I've described. If they weren't bullshit, I wouldn't be mentioning them here. And when I am aware of them as I was when Ms. Hairston came unglued because my mother smiled and tried to wave in recognition, the cops make sure not to respond until after I leave the area, even if I wait for hours. In this way, the Accusing Fingers always maintain the upper hand, and by making sure that judicial review never takes place, the video or other evidence that disproves the complaint or allegations is destroyed, and in this way law enforcement (and CLEO stooges) have managed to cover their tracks at every significant juncture.
"Book-em Dan-O" Lasher and Paul "Pffft" couldn't bring charges associated with any of those arrests for several very good reasons, the most obvious being that I was never arrested and could have easily proved it, and I still had the photo IDs I suspect were used in those reports the day of the identity hearing June 4, 1997. The same principle continues to be pervasive as far as CLEO tactics, and it explains why the Accusing Fingers are very careful to make sure that I am not aware of the complaint when it is actually made. Why Ms. Honey for instance became almost hysterical when I glanced at her notepad to see what she was writing while the cops were setting up for the staged arrest outside. She was preparing a bogus complaint that was supposed to be handed to the cops after I left, so my glance caused more hysteria of the type displayed by Ms. Hairston and several County Hags before and since.
Of course, now that those involved have had plenty of time to destroy the evidence of what actually occurred, when they can say that the video or the records are no longer available, they are much more likely to make their bogus allegations that are supported only by their own statements. CLEOs have never deviated from this pattern, conspicuously avoiding any possibility of contesting the allegations in a timely manner. The last time I actually appeared in court, Steve Cooley dropped the specious charge because he had acquired the arrest and booking photo which was the objective of that particular CLEO charade. (I wasn't even arrested when the citation was issued. But the entire fiasco reminded me that CLEOs have always tried to portray me as an idiot while I've been dissembling their scams thinking the same thing about them.)
No, CLEOs only make their bogus contentions long after any opportunity to properly contest the allegations has passed, the advantage going to CLEOs and PMAPS who can wait for years before filing charges, knowing that the evidence disproving the allegations has been destroyed. So when I read about the guy who had spent eighteen years in prison because a Piece O' Shit prosecutor had ditched the evidence that exonerated him, I wasn't particularly surprised because I've been watching the same principle being demonstrated by CLEOs over the last two decades. It is CLEOs and PMAPS that are primarily responsible for theft, corruption and destruction of evidence for obvious reasons. Not only my personal belongings, the photo IDs associated with all of this, the documentation and records that prove what really occurred, but removing my mother from the list of potential witnesses, falsifying reports to support phony reports in the past, and recruiting CLEO stooges to supply them with bogus complaints and statements intended to cover it up.
So after almost two decades of watching CLEO antics, reporting the separate but related criminal offenses perpetrated against me or my mother at each point they became known, after seeking judicial review on several occasions and writing what has become a 1200-page book with excerpts posted here, no judicial review of any aspect of this has ever taken place. No opportunity to contest any allegation or complaint made against me has ever been possible because CLEOs know that bogus complaints and falsified reports are based solely on the alleged "credibilty" of those that made the complaint or authored the report, and therefore destruction of the evidence that disproves those allegations has always been a requisite.
It could have also been mentioned in the previous essay that the Internet-based attacks on accounts, hardware, software and storage media are felonious activities as well. I'm not a JD like some our esteemed characters, but it has occurred to me that the impersonation involved with any bogus accounts associated with me, especially if stolen property was involved, it could constitute yet another example of a criminal offense perpetrated against your humble writer along with the other CLEO antics described here. That's why the path to the significant points I'm trying to make is necessarily imprecise. In many instances, and on a regular basis, CLEOs, provide the examples for those arguments.
© humble journalist
CLEO Techno Bullshit (Continued)
So once again we are forced to examine the assaults by CLEOs on personal property, false attribution the common denominator and motive. Let us review. When the "IP Scam" became evident, it was because IT Techs and CLEO stooges were making conspicuous efforts to log-on and log-off at the exact moment as your humble writer. Other evidence surfaced. We saw the time-date stamp altered on several occasions, within the account or on the computer. It would be backed up by an hour for instance, such that text written prior to my arrival could be falsely attributed to me. After that, we saw Public Servants handing me a stack of prints, then asking me to find the one or two pages I had actually written. The intent was rather obvious; they wanted me to handle all of those prints such that they could be attributed to me.
We saw the IP changes associated with access to accounts. The IP address retrieved from a "My IP" source prior to log-in to an account different from the one displayed when I was actually logged into it (thus the designation "IP Scam" defined by anything that may have originated from those computers using the same IP ). We saw Ms. Honey coming unglued during the staged arrest referred to in Essay 87, the choreography obviously connected to the internal computers which Ms. Honey was controlling, which required those officials with knowledge of the scam to destroy the hard-drives of their internal computers, (then destroy the evidence that they were replaced).
We also saw the alteration to the time/date within the account itself, allowing for a window that CLEOs exploited to falsely attribute anything that served their purposes within the windows of opportunity supplied by falsifying the time zone of the account.
Since then, we've been provided with many other examples. We've seen the time/date scam perpetrated here in Mr. Roger's neighborhood as well, the remote access program "LogMeIn" which allows for external access to external sources after log-in which has obvious advantages for CLEOs, and of course alterations and deletions to text have always relied on theft of passwords or illegal access to the account. (Ergo, 'control userpassword2' run commands). We also saw CLEO stooge activity suggestive of that which is described in Essay 87, my educated guess being that CLEOs have also decided to incorporate stolen property into their storyline externally. In other words, CLEOs becoming smart enough to know that they have to keep bogus "evidence" outside their internal network otherwise they face a similar problem as Ms. Honey.
The 'control userpassword2' command also suggests another element of the IP scam in progress, typical of CLEOs and their tactics. The objective of all this is to falsely attributed printed text to your humble writer, that text presumably being consistent with CLEO storylines alleging illegal activity. But there is also the possibility of bogus accounts, something I've always suspected but unable to prove. In this scenario, log-in to this account, would be accompanied by an IT tech or a CLEO stooge logging-in to a completely different account, one that I don't know exists. There are two possibilities at that point. Either a password unknown to me is used by the IT Tech or CLEO stooge, or the same password I've assigned to this account.
If the IT Tech or CLEO stooge used a stolen password from this account to access the phantom account, the one that produces CLEO-friendly text, then it would appear that I accessed it when the data of my log-in is recorded. For this reason, the 'control userpassword2' command was not particularly surprising, nor were the efforts in the past to steal passwords by law enforcement and military slime which has occurred many more times than I've detailed here. In fact it provides a possible answer to something I had pondered before; i.e. that during the time I am logged-in to this account, the posting time recorded by Google, I am writing the text of the essays you see here, another account is also being accessed.
(The capability of recording the exact time of the post does not exist with the Hubpages account although I make a note of it occasionally, but while I was writing in the text field, the "draft saved" function allows for the text to be altered and deleted prior to it being saved or published. On many occasions, however, the account was illegally accessed for no other reason than to make deletions to text, like the one described in Essay 137).
The byproduct of these attacks continues to be CLEO-friendly altered text, but for a plausible CLEO storyline to exist, there almost has to be a way to falsely attributed those stacks of printed material to me besides shoving them in front of me and telling me I am expected to find one or two pages in that stack so my fingerprints are associated with CLEO bullshit (read Offensive Rebounds). The stooge activity that CLEOs are directing requires more than a bogus "secret code" scenario. These people cross my path all day long and there is no way they could possibly know who I am or where I may be, all of them affecting portrayals consistent with illegal activity, especially when you consider that there is none.
So where is the bogus CLEO-friendly text coming from and who is writing it? And how do they make it appear that the source is your humble writer? We are getting closer to answering the question as each CLEO scam becomes evident. Because once you understand CLEO motives, everything else becomes predictable, so we are constantly provided with examples, often recycled, of false attribution. (Just prior to posting this essay, a CLEO stooge was conspicuously waving around some prints after establishing proximity).
But it should also be noted that what I am describing here, the illegal access to accounts, the falsifications involved, especially attribution, and the intent of the perpetrators, is clearly malicious, collaborative, premeditated and therefore felonious.
© humble journalist
We saw the IP changes associated with access to accounts. The IP address retrieved from a "My IP" source prior to log-in to an account different from the one displayed when I was actually logged into it (thus the designation "IP Scam" defined by anything that may have originated from those computers using the same IP ). We saw Ms. Honey coming unglued during the staged arrest referred to in Essay 87, the choreography obviously connected to the internal computers which Ms. Honey was controlling, which required those officials with knowledge of the scam to destroy the hard-drives of their internal computers, (then destroy the evidence that they were replaced).
We also saw the alteration to the time/date within the account itself, allowing for a window that CLEOs exploited to falsely attribute anything that served their purposes within the windows of opportunity supplied by falsifying the time zone of the account.
Since then, we've been provided with many other examples. We've seen the time/date scam perpetrated here in Mr. Roger's neighborhood as well, the remote access program "LogMeIn" which allows for external access to external sources after log-in which has obvious advantages for CLEOs, and of course alterations and deletions to text have always relied on theft of passwords or illegal access to the account. (Ergo, 'control userpassword2' run commands). We also saw CLEO stooge activity suggestive of that which is described in Essay 87, my educated guess being that CLEOs have also decided to incorporate stolen property into their storyline externally. In other words, CLEOs becoming smart enough to know that they have to keep bogus "evidence" outside their internal network otherwise they face a similar problem as Ms. Honey.
The 'control userpassword2' command also suggests another element of the IP scam in progress, typical of CLEOs and their tactics. The objective of all this is to falsely attributed printed text to your humble writer, that text presumably being consistent with CLEO storylines alleging illegal activity. But there is also the possibility of bogus accounts, something I've always suspected but unable to prove. In this scenario, log-in to this account, would be accompanied by an IT tech or a CLEO stooge logging-in to a completely different account, one that I don't know exists. There are two possibilities at that point. Either a password unknown to me is used by the IT Tech or CLEO stooge, or the same password I've assigned to this account.
If the IT Tech or CLEO stooge used a stolen password from this account to access the phantom account, the one that produces CLEO-friendly text, then it would appear that I accessed it when the data of my log-in is recorded. For this reason, the 'control userpassword2' command was not particularly surprising, nor were the efforts in the past to steal passwords by law enforcement and military slime which has occurred many more times than I've detailed here. In fact it provides a possible answer to something I had pondered before; i.e. that during the time I am logged-in to this account, the posting time recorded by Google, I am writing the text of the essays you see here, another account is also being accessed.
(The capability of recording the exact time of the post does not exist with the Hubpages account although I make a note of it occasionally, but while I was writing in the text field, the "draft saved" function allows for the text to be altered and deleted prior to it being saved or published. On many occasions, however, the account was illegally accessed for no other reason than to make deletions to text, like the one described in Essay 137).
The byproduct of these attacks continues to be CLEO-friendly altered text, but for a plausible CLEO storyline to exist, there almost has to be a way to falsely attributed those stacks of printed material to me besides shoving them in front of me and telling me I am expected to find one or two pages in that stack so my fingerprints are associated with CLEO bullshit (read Offensive Rebounds). The stooge activity that CLEOs are directing requires more than a bogus "secret code" scenario. These people cross my path all day long and there is no way they could possibly know who I am or where I may be, all of them affecting portrayals consistent with illegal activity, especially when you consider that there is none.
So where is the bogus CLEO-friendly text coming from and who is writing it? And how do they make it appear that the source is your humble writer? We are getting closer to answering the question as each CLEO scam becomes evident. Because once you understand CLEO motives, everything else becomes predictable, so we are constantly provided with examples, often recycled, of false attribution. (Just prior to posting this essay, a CLEO stooge was conspicuously waving around some prints after establishing proximity).
But it should also be noted that what I am describing here, the illegal access to accounts, the falsifications involved, especially attribution, and the intent of the perpetrators, is clearly malicious, collaborative, premeditated and therefore felonious.
© humble journalist
Wednesday, August 24, 2011
CLEO Annoyances
One of the most irritating aspects of CLEO antics has been the alleged "cleverness" involved with their tactics. For some reason they have been unable to confront me directly with any suspicions or allegations. Instead, they have relied on staged photo-ops, bogus complaints, planted evidence, falsified reports and the other contrivances described in these essays, including another demonstration of false attribution using the stooge-computer model. What I observed was a repeat performance of the scam perpetrated by San Diego County law enforcement personnel and described in Essay 87 "ACR: CLEO Consistency" http://nobullshit.hubpages.com/hub/essay87
So the same stolen property, that which Cooley refused to acknowledge, now in the possession of law enforcement by way of Kevin M. Cimarusti and John A. Whitcraft, Jr., continues to be a valuable resource as far as "enforcing the law" at my expense. This is exactly why CLEOs will never acknowledge that a truckload of personal possessions were stolen in the first place. The utility value of them to CLEOs cannot be underestimated as vehicles for false attribution, because years ago prior to those things being hijacked, they did belong to me. So if you forget about the fact that they have been in the possession of hostile parties, especially law enforcement personnel who have demonstrated a propensity for corrupting my property once it has been accessed, they become convenient vehicles for CLEO storylines, no different than phony text generated from a hijacked e-mail account, or the corruption that occurred to my storage media while it was out of my possession, or anything they can recover with my fingerprints from the trash.
It also has value in the sense that CLEOs can place it anywhere they want, including crime scenes, such that I might be associated with it by way of the stolen property. The private content stored on a floppy disk, and stolen photos that must have been digitized by CLEO-friendly stooges, or CLEOs themselves, continue to be a source of consternation because those are the items that were targeted for theft in the first place by Kevin M. Cimarusti and John A. Whitcraft, Jr. for the reasons described here and in Essay 87, and it doesn't appear that law enforcement has any intention of returning personal property reported stolen on several occasions since May 2007, but actually stolen long before.
But it continues to be annoying when I am obliged to watch CLEO stooges affecting portrayals, especially those associated with the IP scam, the use of computers to falsely attribute illegal activity to me, that personal possessions that were stolen more than five years ago are being passed around by law enforcement personnel to perpetrate the various CLEO scams reliant on that stolen, corrupted property. And only after CLEOs know that those things have been corrupted or misappropriated, which is to say after they became CLEO possessions instead of mine.
So we've arrived at a point where CLEO antics are basically recycled scams that have already been observed and described. The CLEOs and the stooges change, but the stolen property, the storylines, the motives and the objectives remain the same. All of which are reliant on CLEO stooges to support them, all of which require theft or corruption to my personal possessions, and all of which dependent on bogus complaints by military personnel to support, those complaints turned into reports by police which has resulted in Mt. CLEO, the mountain of CLEO bullshit constructed from these reports. Obviously, this is necessary to compensate for the lack of reason, logic, motives or profits characteristic of the various CLEO storylines.
And it should also be noted, that while CLEOs demonstrate their clever investigative tactics, while they continue to hand themselves "evidence" of specious allegations using posers, script-readers, bogus complaints and stolen property, they have never once questioned me about anything. They have never, in a straightforward manner at least, asked me where I was when a crime occurred, or anything else pertaining to any illegal activity. The reason is obvious, as it always has been. CLEOs, along with CLEO stooges, are in a constant state of constructing a plausible scenario of illegal activity, not investigating it.
For instance, the mimicry I've observed that appears to be associated with the descriptive accounts in the essays is a lame attempt to criminalize the essays, to turn them into "evidence" of a crime instead of what they are; a simple description of what has occurred since September 20, 1996 when Michael E. Bartley was issued a fraudulent California ID, following equally simple journalistic guidelines regarding who, what, when, where, how and why. I've endeavored to answer all of these questions while taking liberties with the language since this is not a judicial, or a formal, environment. (Here bullshit is bullshit, assholes are assholes, and pieces of shit are pieces of shit, but we keep the burgers because they make sense and follow the rules of logic and reason).
In other words, if there was anything included in these essays that I intended to conceal from the authorities, it wouldn't be posted on the f**cking Internet. So if the legions of CLEOs, the super-covert, highly-trained, law enforcement investigative professionals are trying to say that there is, they are full of shit. To anyone who has read these essays it should be obvious that wherever I go the CLEO antics described here have been pervasive. So my identity and location are hardly a matter of secrecy. I already know that bogus complaints, consistent with CLEO storylines, have been turned into police reports that support those storylines and that CLEO stooges follow me around to supply the complaints, or that the vast majority of those complaints have been made by military personnel or their immediate relatives. CLEOsCLEOs for that purpose. That's the point.
So if CLEOs actually wanted to crawl out from under Mt. CLEO and question me about any illegal activity or crime, all they would have to do is ask, and I have made that known to them on many occasions. Instead, they have done the exact opposite for the reason clearly stated above.
And to accomplish this has always required theft and corruption of my personal belongings, destruction of evidence, bogus complaints and falsified reports. But most of all proxies, CLEO stooges who feed the beast what it needs to propagate any notion of illegal activity, portrayals and staged photo-ops always the primary goal. Without them, especially the Proximity Posers, Text Kooks and boomerangs feigning some sort of bogus "association" there would be nothing to investigate because at no time have I ever been in possession of anything illegal or engaged in any illegal activity, or engaged in any sort of communications that would be a requisite. Nor have there been any profits to support the contention, and CLEOs have always known that. So CLEO stooges must compensate for those gaping holes. The PMAPS adage therefore, is correct. Convicting the guilty is easy. It's the people that aren't that is the challenge.
© humble journalist
"Not to be trusted" (continued):
After I wrote this essay, the time was noted, which for once actually conformed to the actual time. But when I did a trace-route on the IP, some unusual data came back which caused me to go to the 'Run' commands. There I found the command 'control userpasswords2' entered in the command box and then found the same command entered in the others as well.
So the same stolen property, that which Cooley refused to acknowledge, now in the possession of law enforcement by way of Kevin M. Cimarusti and John A. Whitcraft, Jr., continues to be a valuable resource as far as "enforcing the law" at my expense. This is exactly why CLEOs will never acknowledge that a truckload of personal possessions were stolen in the first place. The utility value of them to CLEOs cannot be underestimated as vehicles for false attribution, because years ago prior to those things being hijacked, they did belong to me. So if you forget about the fact that they have been in the possession of hostile parties, especially law enforcement personnel who have demonstrated a propensity for corrupting my property once it has been accessed, they become convenient vehicles for CLEO storylines, no different than phony text generated from a hijacked e-mail account, or the corruption that occurred to my storage media while it was out of my possession, or anything they can recover with my fingerprints from the trash.
It also has value in the sense that CLEOs can place it anywhere they want, including crime scenes, such that I might be associated with it by way of the stolen property. The private content stored on a floppy disk, and stolen photos that must have been digitized by CLEO-friendly stooges, or CLEOs themselves, continue to be a source of consternation because those are the items that were targeted for theft in the first place by Kevin M. Cimarusti and John A. Whitcraft, Jr. for the reasons described here and in Essay 87, and it doesn't appear that law enforcement has any intention of returning personal property reported stolen on several occasions since May 2007, but actually stolen long before.
But it continues to be annoying when I am obliged to watch CLEO stooges affecting portrayals, especially those associated with the IP scam, the use of computers to falsely attribute illegal activity to me, that personal possessions that were stolen more than five years ago are being passed around by law enforcement personnel to perpetrate the various CLEO scams reliant on that stolen, corrupted property. And only after CLEOs know that those things have been corrupted or misappropriated, which is to say after they became CLEO possessions instead of mine.
So we've arrived at a point where CLEO antics are basically recycled scams that have already been observed and described. The CLEOs and the stooges change, but the stolen property, the storylines, the motives and the objectives remain the same. All of which are reliant on CLEO stooges to support them, all of which require theft or corruption to my personal possessions, and all of which dependent on bogus complaints by military personnel to support, those complaints turned into reports by police which has resulted in Mt. CLEO, the mountain of CLEO bullshit constructed from these reports. Obviously, this is necessary to compensate for the lack of reason, logic, motives or profits characteristic of the various CLEO storylines.
And it should also be noted, that while CLEOs demonstrate their clever investigative tactics, while they continue to hand themselves "evidence" of specious allegations using posers, script-readers, bogus complaints and stolen property, they have never once questioned me about anything. They have never, in a straightforward manner at least, asked me where I was when a crime occurred, or anything else pertaining to any illegal activity. The reason is obvious, as it always has been. CLEOs, along with CLEO stooges, are in a constant state of constructing a plausible scenario of illegal activity, not investigating it.
For instance, the mimicry I've observed that appears to be associated with the descriptive accounts in the essays is a lame attempt to criminalize the essays, to turn them into "evidence" of a crime instead of what they are; a simple description of what has occurred since September 20, 1996 when Michael E. Bartley was issued a fraudulent California ID, following equally simple journalistic guidelines regarding who, what, when, where, how and why. I've endeavored to answer all of these questions while taking liberties with the language since this is not a judicial, or a formal, environment. (Here bullshit is bullshit, assholes are assholes, and pieces of shit are pieces of shit, but we keep the burgers because they make sense and follow the rules of logic and reason).
In other words, if there was anything included in these essays that I intended to conceal from the authorities, it wouldn't be posted on the f**cking Internet. So if the legions of CLEOs, the super-covert, highly-trained, law enforcement investigative professionals are trying to say that there is, they are full of shit. To anyone who has read these essays it should be obvious that wherever I go the CLEO antics described here have been pervasive. So my identity and location are hardly a matter of secrecy. I already know that bogus complaints, consistent with CLEO storylines, have been turned into police reports that support those storylines and that CLEO stooges follow me around to supply the complaints, or that the vast majority of those complaints have been made by military personnel or their immediate relatives. CLEOsCLEOs for that purpose. That's the point.
So if CLEOs actually wanted to crawl out from under Mt. CLEO and question me about any illegal activity or crime, all they would have to do is ask, and I have made that known to them on many occasions. Instead, they have done the exact opposite for the reason clearly stated above.
CLEOs are in a constant state of constructing plausible scenarios of illegal activity, not investigating it.
And to accomplish this has always required theft and corruption of my personal belongings, destruction of evidence, bogus complaints and falsified reports. But most of all proxies, CLEO stooges who feed the beast what it needs to propagate any notion of illegal activity, portrayals and staged photo-ops always the primary goal. Without them, especially the Proximity Posers, Text Kooks and boomerangs feigning some sort of bogus "association" there would be nothing to investigate because at no time have I ever been in possession of anything illegal or engaged in any illegal activity, or engaged in any sort of communications that would be a requisite. Nor have there been any profits to support the contention, and CLEOs have always known that. So CLEO stooges must compensate for those gaping holes. The PMAPS adage therefore, is correct. Convicting the guilty is easy. It's the people that aren't that is the challenge.
© humble journalist
"Not to be trusted" (continued):
After I wrote this essay, the time was noted, which for once actually conformed to the actual time. But when I did a trace-route on the IP, some unusual data came back which caused me to go to the 'Run' commands. There I found the command 'control userpasswords2' entered in the command box and then found the same command entered in the others as well.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)