So the same stolen property, that which Cooley refused to acknowledge, now in the possession of law enforcement by way of Kevin M. Cimarusti and John A. Whitcraft, Jr., continues to be a valuable resource as far as "enforcing the law" at my expense. This is exactly why CLEOs will never acknowledge that a truckload of personal possessions were stolen in the first place. The utility value of them to CLEOs cannot be underestimated as vehicles for false attribution, because years ago prior to those things being hijacked, they did belong to me. So if you forget about the fact that they have been in the possession of hostile parties, especially law enforcement personnel who have demonstrated a propensity for corrupting my property once it has been accessed, they become convenient vehicles for CLEO storylines, no different than phony text generated from a hijacked e-mail account, or the corruption that occurred to my storage media while it was out of my possession, or anything they can recover with my fingerprints from the trash.
It also has value in the sense that CLEOs can place it anywhere they want, including crime scenes, such that I might be associated with it by way of the stolen property. The private content stored on a floppy disk, and stolen photos that must have been digitized by CLEO-friendly stooges, or CLEOs themselves, continue to be a source of consternation because those are the items that were targeted for theft in the first place by Kevin M. Cimarusti and John A. Whitcraft, Jr. for the reasons described here and in Essay 87, and it doesn't appear that law enforcement has any intention of returning personal property reported stolen on several occasions since May 2007, but actually stolen long before.
But it continues to be annoying when I am obliged to watch CLEO stooges affecting portrayals, especially those associated with the IP scam, the use of computers to falsely attribute illegal activity to me, that personal possessions that were stolen more than five years ago are being passed around by law enforcement personnel to perpetrate the various CLEO scams reliant on that stolen, corrupted property. And only after CLEOs know that those things have been corrupted or misappropriated, which is to say after they became CLEO possessions instead of mine.
So we've arrived at a point where CLEO antics are basically recycled scams that have already been observed and described. The CLEOs and the stooges change, but the stolen property, the storylines, the motives and the objectives remain the same. All of which are reliant on CLEO stooges to support them, all of which require theft or corruption to my personal possessions, and all of which dependent on bogus complaints by military personnel to support, those complaints turned into reports by police which has resulted in Mt. CLEO, the mountain of CLEO bullshit constructed from these reports. Obviously, this is necessary to compensate for the lack of reason, logic, motives or profits characteristic of the various CLEO storylines.
And it should also be noted, that while CLEOs demonstrate their clever investigative tactics, while they continue to hand themselves "evidence" of specious allegations using posers, script-readers, bogus complaints and stolen property, they have never once questioned me about anything. They have never, in a straightforward manner at least, asked me where I was when a crime occurred, or anything else pertaining to any illegal activity. The reason is obvious, as it always has been. CLEOs, along with CLEO stooges, are in a constant state of constructing a plausible scenario of illegal activity, not investigating it.
For instance, the mimicry I've observed that appears to be associated with the descriptive accounts in the essays is a lame attempt to criminalize the essays, to turn them into "evidence" of a crime instead of what they are; a simple description of what has occurred since September 20, 1996 when Michael E. Bartley was issued a fraudulent California ID, following equally simple journalistic guidelines regarding who, what, when, where, how and why. I've endeavored to answer all of these questions while taking liberties with the language since this is not a judicial, or a formal, environment. (Here bullshit is bullshit, assholes are assholes, and pieces of shit are pieces of shit, but we keep the burgers because they make sense and follow the rules of logic and reason).
In other words, if there was anything included in these essays that I intended to conceal from the authorities, it wouldn't be posted on the f**cking Internet. So if the legions of CLEOs, the super-covert, highly-trained, law enforcement investigative professionals are trying to say that there is, they are full of shit. To anyone who has read these essays it should be obvious that wherever I go the CLEO antics described here have been pervasive. So my identity and location are hardly a matter of secrecy. I already know that bogus complaints, consistent with CLEO storylines, have been turned into police reports that support those storylines and that CLEO stooges follow me around to supply the complaints, or that the vast majority of those complaints have been made by military personnel or their immediate relatives. CLEOsCLEOs for that purpose. That's the point.
So if CLEOs actually wanted to crawl out from under Mt. CLEO and question me about any illegal activity or crime, all they would have to do is ask, and I have made that known to them on many occasions. Instead, they have done the exact opposite for the reason clearly stated above.
CLEOs are in a constant state of constructing plausible scenarios of illegal activity, not investigating it.
And to accomplish this has always required theft and corruption of my personal belongings, destruction of evidence, bogus complaints and falsified reports. But most of all proxies, CLEO stooges who feed the beast what it needs to propagate any notion of illegal activity, portrayals and staged photo-ops always the primary goal. Without them, especially the Proximity Posers, Text Kooks and boomerangs feigning some sort of bogus "association" there would be nothing to investigate because at no time have I ever been in possession of anything illegal or engaged in any illegal activity, or engaged in any sort of communications that would be a requisite. Nor have there been any profits to support the contention, and CLEOs have always known that. So CLEO stooges must compensate for those gaping holes. The PMAPS adage therefore, is correct. Convicting the guilty is easy. It's the people that aren't that is the challenge.
© humble journalist
"Not to be trusted" (continued):
After I wrote this essay, the time was noted, which for once actually conformed to the actual time. But when I did a trace-route on the IP, some unusual data came back which caused me to go to the 'Run' commands. There I found the command 'control userpasswords2' entered in the command box and then found the same command entered in the others as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment