Before continuing with subjects that are slightly more intellectually challenging than CLEO antics, let us review some of those observed thus far and the "CLEO Logic" associated with them. First, we know that CLEO establish "associates" with photo-ops and other contrivances like waves, honks and signals. Anyone that crosses my path provides CLEOs this opportunity. After that, anything CLEO stooges do becomes attributable to your humble writer, and I suspect that what they do, knowing that CLEOs are directing all this crap, is likely something illegal, otherwise what is the point?
We also know that CLEOs maintain control over the environment, communications and the testimony and statements of CLEO stooges. The "credibility" issues are overcome by the fact that CLEOs, and presumably the stooges as well, have the alleged credibility to be persuasive, regardless of how ludicrous the premises or assumptions. One of those, of course, would be the notion that your humble writer would do anything illegal at all after witnessing all the CLEO contrivances that are described here. Another would be to accommodate CLEOs by doing anything illegal in public which would include the use of public facilities and/or computers that are obviously controlled by CLEOs and parties hostile to your humble writer.
The lack of logic or reason has never dissuaded CLEOs in the past however, and after watching the mimicry associated with the postings of essays, it appears that "CLEO Logic" includes a scenario that includes my essays, which as I've said before, is tantamount to criminalizing them. Now I'm not really sure who is supposed to believe that scenario; that I would post something that was part of a scenario that included illegal activity so that the CLEO brain trust could come along with their superior intellectual capabilities to discern it. "Look, Your Honor, these essays are part of an elaborate 'secret code' . . . " and so on.
That, of course, would be stupid, as would any scenario that excluded profits, but remember that CLEO Logic only serves its own purposes, and therefore we find constructs like "CLEOs are the 'Good Guys' and therefore anyone that criticizes them must be (fill in the blank)". CLEO Logic also provides its own premises. Every single scenario I can imagine requires that your humble writer must be the dumbest bastard on the planet, but that's not a problem once CLEO Logic is applied. For instance, Michael E. Bartley was a stupid ex-military drug-addict with a long criminal history. Paul "Pffft" gave me Michael E. Bartley's DA number. According to CLEO logic then, I become a stupid, ex-military drug-addict as well. Instant stupidity courtesy of the CLEO logicians and brain trust.
And throughout these descriptive accounts, it has been painfully obvious that all we are really witnessing are the infinite number of possibilities that are available to CLEOs as vehicles for false attribution. Stooges, props, pieces of paper, costumes, printouts, bogus records of every sort, staged photo-ops, transcribed recitals and comical narratives, all have a place in the CLEO Alternate Universe where the only constant is that something illegal must be going on around me at all times. Because without the premise of "enforcing the law" all of this police activity is tantamount to harassment and a state of perpetual investigation.
So as we watch the same antics, recycled and rehashed to suit CLEO purposes, knowing that anything I touch, anything I say and anything I do becomes part of the CLEO repertoire (even things they recover from the trash like pieces of paper, books and envelopes), knowing their authority and alleged credibility have always been sufficient to preclude the review of professional misconduct, knowing that they have used that authority to steal evidence and exhibits in the past and no doubt will use that authority to steal the remainder of my possessions, we will continue with political commentary which is much more interesting and challenging than the antics of law enforcement personnel and the military slime that direct their stooges and proxies.
My remaining possessions include these essays and approximately 700 pages of previously printed material that includes alterations and deletions caused by illegal, malicious access to personal property. Storage media, all of which has been accessed and corrupted by those described here with the exception of two CDs which include properly dated text of correspondence beginning with a cease and desist letter to John A. Whitcraft, Jr. on January 5, 2007. While many of the paper copies of correspondence that relates to these essays was stolen or replaced by those described here, the computer files of the most significant were saved on those CDs. The files were transferred to a 2 GB flash-drive which I carry on my belt. Two other flash-drives, both corrupted, are are also in my possession. The corruption to both of those flash-drives is described in detail either in these essays, or the 331-page document that preceded them, or the several hundred untitled pages that remain in my possession.
Also included amongst those things I carry and protect on my back, court records that support all that is described here. Several arrest and booking reports that correlate to these essays. Correspondence that includes certified mail receipts, and the receipts associated with correspondence that is found on the properly dated computer files. Correspondence from officials and agencies involved, including Mr. Cooley, his Real Estate Fraud Unit, and the letters that preceded those replies. Letters to and from FBI, DHS and OIG regarding the facts described here, along with certified mail receipts for all.
Also many corrupted CDs which were subject to theft, destruction, or alterations at various junctures, all of these things occurring while in the possession of law enforcement, or military personnel, many were planted or handed to me after being removed by those same parties. Four mini-DV tapes which were handed to me on August 6, 2009 which when brought to the attention of Monrovia Police, were dismissed as insignificant, and so were not viewed by your humble writer in their presence, nor have I had a means of viewing them since.
Prints of e-mails, my remaining employment and medical records, which is to say a fraction of what existed prior to the thefts that were reported to Sierra Madre Police Department on May 22, 2007 (dated files and certified mail to verify) and on many subsequent occasions since, to law enforcement officials with jurisdiction. The bogus version of the phone records described here along with the printout of the "Account Management Error" described here, initialed by the employees who refused to provide accurate records. All of my remaining personal documents, birth certificates, several remaining photo-IDs, receipts for various items like air travel and other expenses related to these descriptive accounts.
And of course, a great deal of miscellaneous documentation, all of it selected for its value to support these accounts because over time I have had to make difficult decisions about what I could carry, what could be protected physically, and unfortunately much has been lost due to lack of a personal security and a location to store these articles and items. But I have learned that to allow access to any personal property, is to allow for theft, destruction and corruption of it, because that is what has occurred on every single occasion that law enforcement or military personnel have gained that access. And on every single occasion that they did, the predicate was specious, contrived, or the result of physical attacks or detention on specious grounds. And on almost every occasion, some sort of falsified report also resulted.
I have made the effort to properly report all of that which is described here to the proper authorities. None has ever acknowledged those offers, nor have they taken any administrative or investigative action regarding any of that which is described here. Nor have they made any effort to consider or acknowledge the documentation that supports those complaints or reports. But for the most part, amongst my remaining possessions are sufficient means of proving that which I have written about here and previously, and as far as journalistic standards, the integrity of these reports has been maintained. That is not to say that those that I have made allegations against were not capable of destroying the evidence of what I described. In fact, they have demonstrated a propensity for stealing and destroying evidence commensurate with their motive to do so. But when that evidence has been destroyed or withheld, I have clearly indicated at which points speculation became necessary and why it was necessary in the first place.
© humble journalist
No comments:
Post a Comment